tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6284358914411024391.post5601655326241005637..comments2008-05-31T16:18:36.191-07:00foodb4fuelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17112878496239444140noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6284358914411024391.post-77030815119257423352008-05-30T20:20:00.000-07:002008-05-30T20:20:00.000-07:00I agree it rehashes all the common points some that have never been proven in any way. Such as this...<BR/><BR/>"but it means less of other crops, such as soybeans and wheat, driving up their prices."<BR/><BR/>I agree that soybean acres planted in 2007 went down in favor of corn acreage, but wheat didn't. Where is the proof? <BR/><BR/>You would think that a professor would only report facts not rehash common misconceptions.<BR/><BR/>And him pointing to the political action taken by Gov Perry of Texas as proof of his point. Give me a break. All that proves is that Texas wants to eliminate the competition for two large industries in their state, the livestock and oil industries. An action which the recent Texas A&M study concluded would do little to change food prices.mus302http://www.americanfuels.infonoreply@blogger.com